Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Ruffling feathers

I think this post may ruffle a few feathers, but I'm game! LOL! Game...get it?? Anyway, it is copied from Doug Phillips blog from Vision Forum.

Releasing Sons and Daughters
From a biblical perspective, children (throughout the course of their entire life)remain under the counsel of their godly parents. But they are only under the command of their parents while they remain a member of their father's household and under his protection, provision and oversight.

There is a great deal of overlap in the training of sons and fathers. But the distinctions are crucial. A key distinction between sons and daughters concerns the goals of their preparation and release. The training of sons should focus on preparing them for independent household leadership. To be qualified for marriage sons must demonstrate their ability to leave their fathers, and stand as a capable, independent household leader. Daughters demonstrate the opposite. The training of daughters should focus on their ability to remain under the authority of a household leader. Daughters who are trained, industrious, content, capable and comfortable serving beside their fathers (as they will someday serve beside their husbands)demonstrate that they are ready for marriage.

Under normal conditions, neither sons nor daughters are capable of emancipating themselves. Sons leave "for this cause" when they are released by their fathers to do so. This release may include a time to "prepare their fields" before they build their houses, but the goal is to see our sons established in independent household leadership.

Daughters are "given" by their fathers in marriage. The normative pattern is that daughters remain under the authority, protection and provision of their godly fathers who have as a primary duty of their fatherhood the charge to protect their virginity, prepare them for marriage and someday present them spotless to a groom. Because they are women under the authority, provision, protection and "roof" of their father, they can not independently contract or covenant without the blessing of the head of household.(Numbers 30)

Remembering that sons leave and daughters are "given" in marriage, an important question for modern Christian fathers to ask is this: "How can I give my daughter away, when I have already directed her to leave?"

To put it another way: How do you seriously intend to give away that which you have already released?

True, we can have a healthy debate about just what constitutes a father releasing his daughter into a state of independence. Is it allowing her to pick and choose various experimental romantic relationships? Is it the act of sending her away from home for four years? Is it having her moving to another city and provide for herself?

There should be no real debate that each step of abdication or potential misdirection on the part of modern fathers pushes the women God has entrusted to their care, protection and provision further from the biblical ideal. To the extent that modern Christian girls are trained for independent leadership, they are being trained to be men.

The modern Christian family is double minded and thus unstable in all of its ways. It wants to borrow the feminist vision for training and releasing daughters, while enforcing a code of parental authority which presupposes the principles of biblical patriarchy.

Modern fathers living in a post-Christian, feminized America must make a choice. They can not have it both ways. They can not, on the one hand, release their daughters into a state of manly independence, and on the other hand, demand of them submission to their parental authority. This confusion has resulted in many daughters who are provoked to wrath because they simply don't know where they stand or what is expected of them.

Dad's it's time to love our sons and daughters enough that we will go back to the ancient paths wherein there is hope.

3 comments:

Charity said...

Misty, thanks for sharing this article. I think we need to get back to the Biblical ideal in so many areas, but we just don't realize sometimes how far off we are. I am looking forward to sharing this with Nate,

Rebekah Castleberry said...

Oooh I love, love LOVE that article!! Thank you for sharing it!!

Anonymous said...

Great article. I always find myself *almost* agreeing...
I'm not sure there's precedent for a single adult child staying in the home forever until marraige, though. That's not what this article is saying, but I've read it elsewhere and it always ruffles my feathers. Paul wasn't married, for example, etc...

I really agree with the articles opinion that the adult-child needs to be "released." That is a very healthy and natural way of looking at it. I also tend to agree a bit with daughters staying home until they are married.

Again, I'm not entirely sure this is a Scriptural "commandment" at all, but I do think it can often be a very wise practice. That being said, I loved the fact that the Pearl's oldest daughter, Rebekkah, went to Bible College and then to the mission field (New Guinea and later to Israel, I believe). So...

I guess that makes me a middle-of-the-roader! HA!

I suppose the only thing I get uncomfortable with is when we start calling societal norms "commandments." Greek and/or Jewish custom during NT times is not a commandment for the Christian. It was simply the custom of the day. We MAY be able to gain some good practical wisdom from it...or maybe not.

Some of the customs are simply beautiful. Others, like the men thanking God daily that they weren't born a woman, or the affluent Roman practice of bulemia, infanticide, etc., are things I'd rather pass on. :) Point being, just because it's what they did during Bible times doesn't make it a Scriptural command.

Love,
Molly